||表面的中立政策と別異的効果 : 妊娠女性への差別を例に
Facially Neutral Policy and Disparate Impact: The Example of Pregnancy Discrimination
79 , 2017-03-01
This article analyzes pregnancy discrimination, including the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. case. The article explains the disparate treatment theory for pregnant women, the court's decisions, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidance, and the legislative history of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. It concludes that the disparate impact theory can mandate employers to provide accommodations to women affected by pregnancy.