Journal Article Continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: Results of the Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial

Birnie, David  ,  Hudnall, Harrison  ,  Lemke, Bernd  ,  Aonuma, Kazutaka  ,  Lee, Kathy Lai-Fun  ,  Gasparini, Maurizio  ,  Gorcsan, John  ,  Cerkvenik, Jeffrey  ,  Martin, David O.

14 ( 12 )  , pp.1820 - 1825 , 2017-12 , Elsevier
ISSN:15475271
NCID:AA11968909
Description
BackgroundData from randomized trials have suggested a modest or no effect of conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (convCRT) on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). AdaptivCRT (aCRT, Medtronic, Mounds View, MN) is a recently described algorithm for synchronized left ventricular (LV) pacing and continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).ObjectiveWe compared the long-term effects of aCRT with convCRT pacing on the incidence of AF.MethodsThe Adaptive CRT trial randomized CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D)–indicated patients (2:1) to receive either aCRT or convCRT pacing. The aCRT algorithm evaluates intrinsic conduction every minute, providing LV-only pacing during normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction and AV and ventriculoventricular timing adjustments during prolonged AV conduction. The primary outcome of this subanalysis was an episode of AF >48 consecutive hours as detected by device diagnostics.ResultsOver a follow-up period with a mean and standard deviation of 20.2 ± 5.9 months, 8.7% of patients with aCRT and 16.2% with convCRT experienced the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31–0.93; P = .03). In patients with prolonged baseline AV, the incidence of the primary outcome was 12.8% in patients randomized to aCRT compared with 27.4% in convCRT patients (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.24–0.85; P = .01). Also, patients with AF episodes adjudicated as clinical adverse events were less common with aCRT (4.3%) than with convCRT (12.7%) (HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.19–0.79; P = .01).ConclusionPatients receiving aCRT had a reduced risk of AF compared with those receiving convCRT. Most of the reduction in AF occurred in subgroups with prolonged AV conduction at baseline and with significant left atrial reverse remodeling.
Full-Text

https://tsukuba.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=45341&item_no=1&attribute_id=17&file_no=1

Number of accesses :  

Other information