The Study of Surgical Outcome for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy : Experience of a Single Surgeon with 70 Initial Cases
小山, 梨恵 ,
増井, 仁彦 ,
八田原, 広大 ,
濵田, 彬弘七里, 泰正
泌尿器科紀要 = Acta urologica Japonica
513 , 2017-12-31 , 泌尿器科紀要刊行会
We investigated the surgical outcome for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) withinitial 70 prostate cancer cases performed by a single surgeon between June 2014 and May 2016. The surgeon had a previous experience of more than 400 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Comparative study of the surgical outcome was made between the first 35 patients (group 1) and the second 35 patients (group 2). The console time without lymph node dissection significantly decreased from group 1 to 2 (193 min vs 158 min, p=0.002). Among specific 3 parts of the console operation (part 1 : until the bladder neck transection, part 2 : until the prostate removal and part 3 : urethrovesical anastomosis), duration of parts 1 and 2 similarly decreased witha significant difference of 0. 001 and 0. 002, respectively. Continence recovery rates 1 month after RALP were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (group1 : 48.5% vs group 2 : 74.2%, p=0.02). Between groups 1 and 2, the positive surgical margin rates of both pT2 and pT3 were similar (group 1 : 20. 8 and 50. 0%, group 2 : 17. 2 and 50. 0%, respectively). The perioperative 8 complications (11.4%) were classified into Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2. Our surgical outcome of initial 70 RALP cases was considered as comparable to that reported from the high volume centers.